IP Geolocation Problems: Why Public Databases Cause Major Issues for Businesses
IP Geolocation Problems: Why Public Databases Cause Major Issues for Businesses
Introduction: The Hidden Challenge of IP Geolocation
Every organization that operates online depends on accurate IP information. Whether it’s for advertising, content delivery, or fraud prevention, knowing the correct location of an IP address seems essential. Unfortunately, the reality is that public geolocation databases often get it wrong.
Many companies and even governments rely on third-party websites to determine the country or region of an IP address. These platforms, however, frequently contain outdated or incorrect data. The result is frustration, lost traffic, and sometimes financial damage.
In this article, we explore the most common IP geolocation problems and explain why the only truly reliable sources are the regional internet registries: RIPE NCC, ARIN, APNIC, and AFRINIC.
1. Understanding IP Geolocation and Its Importance
IP geolocation refers to the process of determining the physical location of a device or server based on its IP address. Businesses use this information to tailor services, restrict access, calculate taxes, or deliver localized content.
Accurate geolocation improves user experience and ensures compliance with local regulations. On the other hand, incorrect data can create serious complications such as blocked customers, misdirected ads, and inaccurate analytics.
Although the goal of geolocation databases is accuracy, their methods are often flawed. Most rely on automated data scraping or outdated registry snapshots rather than live, verified information.
2. The Root of the Problem: Outdated and Inconsistent Data
Public geolocation websites gather information from various sources. However, they rarely synchronize directly with regional internet registries (RIRs).
Instead, they collect historical WHOIS records, user feedback, and internet routing tables. This approach introduces delays and inconsistencies. For example, an IP block recently transferred from Finland to Turkey might still appear as “Japan” in a public database weeks later.
These mismatches create confusion for businesses that rely on geolocation for access control, payment gateways, or advertising campaigns.
3. Only RIR Databases Are Authoritative
The only reliable authorities for IP allocation and regional assignment are the official RIR databases:
-
RIPE NCC for Europe, the Middle East, and parts of Central Asia
-
ARIN for North America
-
APNIC for Asia-Pacific
-
AFRINIC for Africa
Each registry maintains verified, real-time information about IP allocations and organizations responsible for them. This data defines the legitimate “country” field for every IP prefix.
If an IP range is updated in RIPE, that record becomes the only valid reference. Unfortunately, third-party websites often fail to fetch or interpret these updates correctly.
4. How Public Databases Misinterpret Registry Fields
One of the biggest IP geolocation problems is the misunderstanding of registry attributes. RIRs store multiple fields like country, org, and mnt-by.
The country field indicates the administrative location of the organization, not necessarily the real-time physical location of the IP usage. Public databases frequently assume that this field equals the device’s actual position.
For instance, if a global hosting provider based in Germany allocates subnets to clients in Kenya or India, the registry might still show “DE” as the country code. Automated tools interpret that incorrectly, displaying the range as “Germany” when in fact it’s used elsewhere.
5. The Delay in Updates and Propagation
Another persistent issue is update latency. When an IP range changes ownership or geolocation, the modification is recorded immediately in the RIPE, ARIN, APNIC, or AFRINIC database.
However, public geolocation sites refresh their data only every few weeks or even months. As a result, many online services continue using outdated mappings.
During this lag, companies experience problems such as wrong country flags, incorrect currency displays, or blocked access from payment systems. These delays are not minor inconveniences they affect user trust and business operations directly.
6. False Country Identification and Its Consequences
Incorrect geolocation can lead to serious business disruptions. When a user’s IP is misclassified, entire regions can face unintended restrictions.
For example, a European e-commerce site might block visitors incorrectly identified as coming from a “restricted country.” Similarly, streaming services might deny access to legitimate customers because their IPs appear in the wrong territory.
Even worse, companies using fraud-detection systems may mistakenly flag legitimate transactions as suspicious, simply due to bad geolocation data.
7. The SEO and Marketing Impact
Geolocation errors also damage search engine optimization and online marketing efforts. Search engines like Google sometimes use IP-based hints to personalize local results.
If your IP addresses are incorrectly mapped, your servers may appear to be located in another continent. Consequently, local customers will see slower performance, mismatched content, or irrelevant ads.
For international brands and ISPs, this confusion can reduce visibility and revenue. Correcting such damage takes time and coordination across multiple data providers.
8. The Problem of Duplicate or Conflicting Sources
Most geolocation websites rely on a mix of public WHOIS data, traceroutes, and user submissions. Since each uses different methods and update cycles, their results often conflict.
One database might show an IP range in “France,” another in “Singapore,” and a third in “Netherlands.” Businesses and end users then face uncertainty about which source to trust.
Only the RIR’s authoritative record offers a definitive answer. If the RIPE database lists “FI” for a prefix, that value overrides every external interpretation.
9. Misuse of Geolocation Data by Firewalls and CDNs
Many firewall systems and content delivery networks (CDNs) automatically rely on geolocation APIs. When these APIs provide inaccurate data, users get blocked for no reason.
For instance, a company hosting servers in Poland might see all its traffic blocked in Germany because a commercial database still lists the IPs as “China.” The result is lost clients and damaged reputation.
Using only RIR-based or verified geolocation sources helps avoid such embarrassing and costly mistakes.
10. Delay in Removing Old Assignments
When IP ownership changes, public databases often fail to remove previous associations. The same IP may still appear linked to an old company or even a completely different country.
This creates serious reputational issues. Suppose a hosting provider acquires a subnet that once belonged to a spammer. Even if the IPs are clean now, public databases might continue labeling them as high risk for months.
Hyper ICT helps clients fix this problem by submitting accurate geofeed and registry updates directly to the RIR systems, ensuring faster propagation and trust recovery.
11. Business Consequences of Bad Geolocation Data
Incorrect geolocation affects multiple aspects of operations:
-
Lost Revenue: Customers blocked from accessing services.
-
Compliance Issues: Wrong tax or legal jurisdiction applied.
-
Support Overhead: Increased user complaints and manual verifications.
-
Brand Reputation: Customers perceive your company as unreliable or inaccessible.
These cascading effects cost organizations time and money. Correcting them requires close coordination with registries and providers that understand the technical nuances of geolocation.
12. Why Hyper ICT Oy Relies on Verified Registry Data
At Hyper ICT Oy, we manage IP addresses exclusively using verified RIR data. Each range leased or managed by us is properly registered in RIPE, ARIN, or APNIC, with accurate country codes and geofeed files.
Our process ensures that all associated information such as rDNS, abuse contacts, and RPKI records matches the official database entries. Consequently, when search engines or geolocation providers eventually update their systems, they synchronize to the correct country automatically.
We also assist clients by submitting structured geofeed URLs that align with RIPE and APNIC standards, improving long-term accuracy.
13. Educating Customers and Correcting the Records
Many customers contact us believing their IPs show the wrong country. In almost every case, the issue lies not in the RIPE database but in outdated public websites.
To fix it, we guide them to check the authoritative record directly using official registry tools such as:
Once the registry entry confirms the correct country, we assist in notifying third-party providers to update their datasets.
14. The Technical Role of Geofeed Files
A geofeed file is a CSV document hosted by the IP holder that lists each prefix and its intended country or region. Major geolocation services can automatically import this data when properly referenced in the RIPE database.
Hyper ICT maintains and updates geofeed files for all managed ranges. This mechanism reduces mismatches by providing a machine-readable source of truth. Over time, consistent use of geofeed files helps correct errors across public databases.
15. Example: When Wrong Geolocation Hurts a Business
A hosting company in the Netherlands once leased an IP range originally registered in Japan. Public databases still showed “Tokyo” as the active location, even though the range was routed entirely in Amsterdam.
Search engines and payment systems treated their users as “foreign” visitors, rejecting transactions and slowing local traffic. Only after updating RIPE records and submitting a proper geofeed file did the situation normalize.
This case perfectly illustrates how IP geolocation problems can damage a legitimate business when incorrect data spreads unchecked.
16. Best Practices to Avoid Geolocation Problems
Companies can minimize these issues by following several simple steps:
-
Always verify IP location using official RIR databases.
-
Publish and maintain accurate geofeed files.
-
Work with reliable IP providers that handle registry updates regularly.
-
Avoid relying solely on public geolocation APIs.
-
Monitor changes across RIPE, ARIN, and APNIC databases.
These practices ensure your IP space reflects accurate, authoritative information at all times.
Conclusion: Trust the Registries, Not the Aggregators
Public geolocation sites can be helpful for quick lookups but should never be treated as official sources. Their data often lags behind, contains errors, and causes serious operational problems.
Only the regional internet registries  RIPE, ARIN, APNIC, and AFRINIC provide verified and authoritative IP information. Hyper ICT Oy helps organizations maintain accurate data across these registries, ensuring clean, consistent, and trustworthy network representation worldwide.
When accuracy matters, skip the unreliable public databases. Check the source, trust the registries, and keep your business connected where it truly belongs.
 Visit www.hyper-ict.com
Contact Hyper ICT
